For the group i have 3 information sheets, for our peer evaluation, and Tom C and Tom B have the other 3 sheets to upload.
Key for marking criteria:- 1) = Excellent. 2) = Very good. 3)= Good. 4)= Ok. 5 = Poor.
Overall for holding a shot steady we have been given '2' And one '3' this was because there were some parts in the sequence that should have been steady but werent.
For camera framing we have been given '2' and the overall comment was that we did keep the main characters in the frame.
For using a variety of shot distance as appropriate overall was also a '2' and the overall comment was that we did have a few different shots but we could have added more.
For shooting material appropriate for the task set for a thriller the overall comment was that it felt more like an action film / thriller. But wasnt really fast pace enough. for this we were marked a '3'
For the use of mise en scene lighting and costume/props we were marked "1/2" and the overall comments were that the lighting we used was very good and worked well with the setting. And the costume we used was good and suited the sequence.
For the way in which the product was edited we were marked a "4" overall, as most people thought we should have used a wider variety of edits, rather than just cuts. I think this is a good point raised as the thriller would have benefitted a wider range of edits instead of just cuts.
For the use of sound overall we were marked a "4" as everyone had noticed that the soundtrack played all the way through the film. Which ruined the pace of the film. And was also a mistake as the music was not suppose to play all the way throw, it was just suppose to be at the start of the credits. This was a major let down for the sequence. And also we needed to of used a punch sound to improve the contunity.
For the titles we also got marked a "3" as we had our names at the begining and it didnt really look proffesional enough to be a proper thriller opening.
Overall our thriller opening was marked a "2" for weather it worked as a thriller opening, because of the voice over, which made the viewer want to find out more.
Posted By Jo.
2 comments:
OK Jo - it's useful to have this summarised, but I'm just checking that you do understand that you have to produce a detailed evaluation under each of the headings on the brief sheet I gave you? Email me if you are not sure. All of the others in your group also need to do this and by the end of next week (final deadline).
Also, just to add - remember to include as many visuals as possible.
Post a Comment