Prelininary evaluation

Firstly we going to start with the things wrong with our location, firstly the location didnt fit with the situation. The next low comment was the unwanted props that we had at the beggining of the video. The next evaulation we got for the props was, that our peers found our use of props unintersting. Hower our peers liked that we used realistic props such as the coffee cup and folder. The evaulation we got for lighting was that people noticed that we used natural lighting throught the use of the window, however we didnt use artifical lighting. The following box is coustume and make up, our peers didnt think that the coustumes we used suited the situation. The following box was camera framing and people found that our camera framing was adverage. And the use of the black screen with text was not appreciated as it wasted time. The next box is variety of frames, people found our use of framing too simplistic and a bit dull.
The next box is angles, our peers noticed that there wasnt enough variety and we seemed to only use eyelevel. The following overall opinion on movement was that the pan we used wasnt enough movement from the camera. The 180 degree rule was a success as everyone overall realised we hadnt broken the 180 degree rule. Match on action overall also seemed to work well and our peers thought that this worked well, although the absence of the doors noise when closing was noticed. The shot reverse shot seemed to work well but as the scene was boring people didnt notice it and therefore didnt really see the need to comment on it.

Written by Jo and Michael